Figshare
open access
Disinterring 100 new scientific fallacies direct and indirect: Using discourse and narrative analyses to unearth new scientific fallacies
This paper is by no means our first one on scientific fallacies, we had published at least two papers on this topic earlier over the last couple of years or so. The earlier papers were tied to the twin concepts of discourse analysis and narrative analysis, two emerging concepts in the s
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Second Order Science: Putting the Metaphysics Back Into the Practice of Science#748776
- Introduction to 'Scientific Testimony: Its roles in science and society'#96660
- Why the effectiveness of simple messages about the scientific consensus on climate change has likely been overestimated#16001
- Biocriminology and the Adjudication of Criminal Responsibility: Is There a Consensus Among Scientists' Verdicts?#1047365
- A Discourse of a Method for the Well Guiding of Reason and the Discovery of Truth in the Sciences#43125
Record · ID 983650
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive