arXiv (All)
open access
Dynamic disruption index across citation and cited references windows: Recommendations for thresholds in research evaluation
The temporal dimension of citation accumulation poses fundamental challenges for quantitative research evaluations, particularly in assessing disruptive and consolidating research through the disruption index (D). While prior studies emphasize minimum citation windows (mostly 3-5 years) for reliable
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Impact of Impermanent Web-Located Citations: A Study of Scholarly Conference Publications#1026259
- The Citation Recency Bias: Rethinking Temporal Standards in Literature Review Practices#688382
- How Do LLMs Cite? A Mechanistic Interpretation of Attribution in Retrieval-Augmented Generation#1048329
- Beyond citation-based metrics: Measuring interdisciplinarity via SBERT semantic embeddings and its heterogeneous effects on citation impact.#395827
- HALLMARK: Diagnosing Three Failure Modes in LLM Citation Verifiers#386769
Record · ID 984846
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive