arXiv (All)
open access
A comparison of definitions of equivariant trees
We show that various categories of trees can be modeled by Grothendieck constructions on categories of trees with a fixed set of leaves. We prove this result for the dendroidal category $Ω$, the category $Ω^G$ of trees with a $G$-action for a finite group $G$, and finally for the category of genuine
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Transfer of abelian model structures to equivariant categories and homotopy squares#927417
- Group graded Morita equivalences for wreath products#1048465
- Trees Are Where You Find Them#44948
- On implicit operations and balanced categories#1109611
- Six-functor formalism for Kummer étale cohomology of log schemes#794182
Record · ID 984953
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive