arXiv (All)
open access
Narrative Flattening: How Post-Training Compresses Thematic, Affective, and Stylistic Variation in LLM Fiction
Large language models produce fluent fiction, yet their creative output is widely seen as flat. We ask where this quality originates in the training and whether it affects different domains of human fiction equally. We construct a matched story-continuation paradigm across StoryStar (public-platform
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Do Large Language Models Always Tell The Same Stories?#924098
- Do Large Language Models Always Tell The Same Stories?#919869
- Humans Introduce, Models Elaborate: Asymmetric Narrative Agency in Human-LLM Co-Writing#987899
- Summarization Bias: The Directional Collapse of Objective Projection into Told-Mode Labels in Large Language Models — A Conceptual Framework and Registered Test Protocol#722620
- Transitional adaptation of pretrained models for visual storytelling#450659
Record · ID 985105
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive