arXiv (All)
open access
Policy Gains or Household Need? The Allocation Logic of China's Dibao Program
When social assistance is scarce, should it prioritize households in greatest need or those expected to benefit most? Using panel data from the China Household Finance Survey, we distinguish allocation principles by combining predicted policy gains with entry into China's Minimum Living Standard Gua
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Relationship between China's One-Child Policy and Female Empowerment#15900
- The Relationship between China's One-Child Policy and Female Empowerment#1169199
- The Relationship between China's One-Child Policy and Female Empowerment#1168995
- Intergenerational Mobility in China#1013244
- DP18984: Can AI Improve Household Welfare in Poorer Countries? Evidence and Measurement Challenges#1175266
Record · ID 985766
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive