arXiv (All)
open access
ClinConsensus: A Physician-Calibrated Benchmark for Evaluating Clinical Rubric Coverage in Chinese Medical LLMs
Open-ended medical LLM evaluation remains weakly grounded in physician-calibrated coverage of clinically relevant response criteria, especially in localized clinical settings. We introduce \textsc{ClinConsensus}, a Chinese medical benchmark of 2{,}500 expert-curated cases spanning 36 specialties, 12
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Performance stability despite iteration: evaluating DeepSeek and ChatGPT on Chinese medical licensing examinations.#354699
- Right Answer, Wrong Reason: Accuracy, Consistency, and Consensus Are Misleading Indicators of LLM Faithfulness in Clinical Decision Support#1117148
- Benchmark evaluation of DeepSeek large language models in clinical decision-making#359604
- Combining Optimization and Randomization Approaches for the Design of Clinical Trials#770632
- Clinical Evaluator Outcomes Reliability Study#918150
Record · ID 986206
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive