arXiv (All)
open access
Do Vision-Language Models Agree on the Affective Qualities of Shape? A Cross-Model Audit for Generative Design Interfaces
Generative design interfaces increasingly expose semantic controls that let users steer output with concepts such as "more elegant" or "more minimalist," typically encoded by a vision-language model (VLM). A practical question is whether state-of-the-art VLMs represent objects consistently in terms
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- VLA-Trace: Diagnosing Vision-Language-Action Models through Representation and Behavior Tracing#793695
- VLA-Trace: Diagnosing Vision-Language-Action Models through Representation and Behavior Tracing#789691
- Real Images, Worse Judgments: Evaluating Vision-Language Models on Concreteness and Imagery#974439
- Why Do Vision Language Models Struggle To Recognize Human Emotions?#19042
- Do Emotion Concepts Generalize Across Sources, Modalities, and Architectures in Vision-Language Models?#1129000
Record · ID 986340
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive