arXiv (All)
open access
Closing the Consistency Gap: Self-Evolving Agents That Learn to Stay on Course
Large language model (LLM)-powered agents can be accurate on average yet unreliable in production, a discrepancy that has been observed but remains largely unaddressed. When given the same task five times, a ReAct agent on the AppWorld benchmark using GPT-4.1 succeeds in all five runs only 53% of th
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- E2E-SWE: Benchmarking LLMs on Building Working Codebases from Scratch#1169651
- E2E-SWE: Benchmarking LLMs on Building Working Codebases from Scratch#1142936
- Towards a Systems Foundation for Agentic Skills: Architecture, Lifecycle, and Security#798236
- Towards a Systems Foundation for Agentic Skills: Architecture, Lifecycle, and Security#796823
- Beyond the Model: Demystifying Harness Effects in Software Engineering Agents#1116790
Record · ID 986460
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive