arXiv (All)
open access
Covariate Adjustment in Randomized Experiments: A Unified Framework for Decision and Practice
Should researchers adjust for covariates in randomized experiments, and if so, how? The literature offers three distinct prescriptions: do not adjust because randomization guarantees unbiasedness; adjust for outcome-prognostic covariates to improve precision; or adjust for covariates imbalanced betw
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Randomization Inference with Sample Attrition#1062776
- Machine learning to optimize precision in the analysis of randomized trials: A journey in pre-specified, yet data-adaptive learning.#269477
- Unbiased Treatment Effect Estimation under Network Interference via Neighborhood-Excluded Cross-Fitting#1049028
- Women do not select "laterally": a percentile-normalized re-analysis of Topinkova & Diviak (2025)#16043
- When do Random Forests work?#1116096
Record · ID 986648
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive