arXiv (All)
open access
Measuring LLM Sycophancy under Sustained Multi-Turn Pressure
Large language models (LLMs) may abandon correct positions when users push back, exhibiting a failure mode known as sycophancy. Existing evaluations typically use short, pre-specified conversations and may therefore miss failures that emerge under sustained, adaptive disagreement. We introduce SPINE
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- How LLMs Follow Instructions: Skillful Coordination, Not a Universal Mechanism#998179
- Sycophancy Is Not One Thing: Causal Separation of Sycophantic Behaviors in LLMs#1130473
- Pass or Fail? Evaluating LLMs on Two Greek Examination Benchmarks#1129417
- Agentic Scaffolding Amplifies Sycophantic Behavior in Large Language Models#821990
- Cheap Talk Stabilizes Strategic Interaction in LLM Agents#1110639
Record · ID 986693
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive