arXiv (All)
open access
In RAG We Trust? Measuring Robustness of Retrieval-Augmented Generation Under Document Poisoning
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) grounds a language model in retrieved documents, which reduces hallucination but creates a new attack surface: if retrieved text is tampered with, the model may repeat the falsehood. We study how much a small quantized model, Llama 3.1 8B, degrades when a fractio
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- RAG-Safety-Bench: Reliable Evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented LLM Safety#999446
- TRIS: A Tri-Layer Retrieval Integrity Sieve Against Knowledge Poisoning#819916
- Towards Privacy-Preserving Large Language Model: Text-free Inference Through Alignment and Adaptation#985042
- Stale-Document Poisoning: When Outdated Retrieval Overrides Correct Model Answers#1106041
- When Words Are Safe But Actions Kill: Probing Physical Danger Beyond Text Safety in Hidden-State Risk Space#373319
Record · ID 987009
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive