arXiv (All)
open access
Playing Whack-a-Mole with misconceptions about memorization, extraction, and copyright
After careful review, I'm confident the headline fine-tuning memorization results in Alignment Whack-a-Mole use an invalid measurement procedure. The book memorization coverage metric these headline results depend on counts sequence matches far shorter than what field standards consider valid eviden
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Erros de Memória e Erros de (Teorias da) Memória [Errors of Memory and Errors of (Theory of) Memory]#716944
- Leibniz and the Function of Book Reviews#635502
- storytracer/US-PD-Books#786832
- The book of one syllable#42000
- Memorisation bias in medical AI#1123605
Record · ID 987081
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive