arXiv (All)
open access
Where Does the Human End? Creative Agency with Generative AI across Five Years of Chinese Digital Painting
As generative AI enters creative work, practitioners must decide where AI assistance ends and human authorship begins. Human-agent interaction (HAI) research has examined AI as a tool, collaborator, consultant, and competitor. The longitudinal problem is how these roles are revised as systems become
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Blurring the Boundaries of Authorship in Digital Art: A Theoretical and Practice-Based Analysis of AI-Enabled Human-Machine Interaction#433412
- Exploring Expectations, Ethical Dimensions, and Values for Voice-Enabled AI Assistants That Support Older Adults and Informal Family Caregivers: Participatory Speculative Design Study.#288964
- Like A Thief in the Night: Do AI Tools Hijack Marketing Creativity?#243644
- Safeguarding literary and intellectual property in the age of artificial intelligence: Legal frameworks, opportunities, and challenges#1181281
- Position: The Pre/Post-Training Boundary Should Govern IP in Industry–Academia ML Collaborations#260918
Record · ID 987093
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive