arXiv (All)
open access
Do LLMs Make More Mistakes If They Do Not Believe the Input Data?
Large language models (LLMs) are prone to hallucinating or misinterpreting facts, which impairs their usability in retrieval-augmented generation or data-to-text systems. We analyse how faithfulness of LLMs to provided context depends on how plausible they perceive the context to be (context-memory
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- FrugalPrompt: Reducing Contextual Overhead in Large Language Models via Token Attribution#972975
- Bias in Large Language Models: Origin, Evaluation, and Mitigation#189222
- Epistemic Warrant for LLM Recommendations: Characterizing the Basis for Reliance When Ground Truth Is Unavailable#926995
- Heavy-Tailed Memory Traces in Long-Horizon Language Agents#1154633
- Skill Following: Evaluating Actual Skill Use in Retrieval-Enabled LLM Agents#819988
Record · ID 987119
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive