arXiv (All)
open access
Scalable Oversight for AI in Mental Health: Lessons from 350,000 AI Coaching Conversations between Therapy Sessions
Clinician review of every AI output is often proposed as a safeguard in mental healthcare, but vigilance research suggests this approach fails at scale and may paradoxically reduce safety. Drawing on our experience deploying an AI coaching tool across 350,000+ conversations between therapy sessions,
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The AWARE (AI Use, Why, Attachment, Reality and Risk, and Effect on Functioning) Framework for Assessing Patients' Use of AI in Mental Health Care.#1167221
- Extracting common processes across psychotherapies through AI#129427
- Digital Dilemmas: How Social Media and AI Influence Mental Health among Men in Today’s Workforce#323853
- Information quality, readability, and empathy of AI-generated public mental health information: a comparative evaluation of eight large language models.#360874
- Can LLMs Provide Valid Cognitive Insight about Humans?#723598
Record · ID 987272
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive