arXiv (All)
open access
When is statistical evidence strong enough? Using hypothesis tests to value data collection
We recast statistical significance as a choice between making an immediate policy recommendation and deferring it until further evidence is collected. We show that the welfare-optimal decision corresponds, under minimax regret, to a statistical test whose level depends on the cost and precision of a
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Active Choice, Implicit Defaults, and the Incentive to Choose#177621
- Pure and Impure Time Preferences#114869
- Recent Developments in Welfarist Social Choice#729132
- Empirical Signatures of Choice-Induced Preference Change#409806
- People make inferences from policy decisions regarding default options: Replication and extension of McKenzie et al. (2006)#298998
Record · ID 987283
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive