arXiv (All)
open access
Am I More Pointwise or Pairwise? Revealing Position Bias in Rubric-Based LLM-as-a-Judge
Large language models are widely employed as evaluators, a paradigm commonly referred to as LLM-as-a-judge. Prior research has predominantly examined point-wise or pair-wise evaluation protocols; in contrast, our focus is on rubric-based evaluation, which has been attracting increasing attention owi
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Pair Difficulty Matters: Rethinking Pairwise LLM-as-a-Judge Evaluation and Consistency#1141894
- Classifying Interpretive Canons at the Sentence Level: A Benchmark from the German Federal Constitutional Court#1063156
- Can LLMs Follow Medical Expert Logic? A Benchmark for Hierarchical Logical Consistency in Risk-of-Bias Assessment#998734
- Whom Do AI Agents Work For? Role Assignment Induces Sponsorship Bias in LLM Recommenders#1011700
- Securing Large Language Models: Addressing Bias, Misinformation, and Prompt Attacks#1035267
Record · ID 987580
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive