arXiv (All)
open access
Towards Characterizing Scientific Image Utility and Upgradability
Scientific images function as critical evidence in research communication, yet their integrity faces unprecedented threats from AI-generated content that introduces subtle but consequential errors. Existing evaluation paradigms prove inadequate: perceptual quality metrics poorly correlate with scien
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- T-MoXAI: A Hierarchical Explainability Framework for Temporal Multimodal Data#1118758
- Smoothing the Semantic Landscape: Generalizable AI-Generated Image Detection via Text-Induced Flatness#1116218
- Intern-S2-Preview: Scientific Agentic Foundation Model#451283
- Evaluating the Evaluators: Diagnosing Large Multimodal Models for AI-Generated Image Assessment#1141893
- SciCode-Verified: How Benchmark Defects Underestimated the Scientific-Coding Ability of Language Models#429402
Record · ID 987695
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive