arXiv (All)
open access
A Resource for Enthymeme Detection in Controversial Political Discourse
Enthymemes, arguments with unstated premises or conclusions, are pervasive in persuasive discourse, yet their annotation remains notoriously subjective. We present a resource of 1,482 tweets from politically controversial discourse, annotated by five annotators for the presence of enthymemes and the
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Retrieving Relations, Detecting Fallacies: A RAG Approach to Political Debate Analysis#780789
- Retrieving Relations, Detecting Fallacies: A RAG Approach to Political Debate Analysis#779414
- Embedding Models for Stance-Aware Argument Retrieval#792301
- Embedding Models for Stance-Aware Argument Retrieval#788301
- Who Argues What? Joint Argument-Entity Detection and Classification in Political Debates#997100
Record · ID 987705
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive