arXiv (All)
open access
A Human Audit of OpenAIs AI-Generated Mathematical Proofs
We assess 18 chapter-specific reviews of the ten mathematical results announced by OpenAI on 1 August 2026, alongside review standards, Lean formalizations, subsequent research, and mathematical references. The article audits this review record without claiming a complete reconstruction of all ten p
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Advancing Mathematics Research with AI-Driven Formal Proof Search#216859
- Proofs for a price: Tomorrow’s ultra-rigorous mathematical culture#78684
- Graduate Mathematics in the Age of AI: Forming Mathematicians for Original, Independent, and Responsible Inquiry#1037574
- When Equivalence Obscures: On Mathematical Reduction, Epistemic Access, and Expository Machines The Jensen–Laguerre route to the Riemann Hypothesis as a case study#91153
- Statistical Theory in the Age of Machine-Assisted Mathematics: Rethinking How Theory Is Made and Taught#927767
Record · ID 987785
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive