OSF
open access
Purpose, Necessity, and Contestability: Documentary Duties When Workplace Scores Become Surveillance
This paper asks which existing privacy and monitoring duties are implicated when workplace surveillance is treated as one link in a wider pattern of artificial-intelligence disadvantage, rather than as a closed technical feature. It is not a prediction of how any court will rule, and it invents no h
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
OSF
Related documents
- Unblinking eyes: the ethics of automating surveillance#750267
- Surveillance Capitalism: a Marx-inspired account#775359
- The connected workplace: Characteristics and social consequences of work surveillance in the age of datification, sensorization, and artificial intelligence.#148255
- PROTECTING PRIVACY#2109
- Is That Lawful? Data Privacy and Fitness Trackers in the Workplace#400386
Record · ID 989317 · SHA-256 181194287ca0a0b3
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive