PsyArXiv
metadata only
What beliefs are most debunkable?
Large language models (LLMs) can persuade people to revise their beliefs, but it is unclear which beliefs are most "debunkable," and why. Across three pooled studies, participants (N = 3,341 online U.S. adults) discussed a self-reported conspiracy or other epistemically suspect belief with GPT-4, in
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- What beliefs are most debunkable?#989237
- On the origin of conspiracy theories#89927
- Beyond Belief: Why Institutional Conditions Matter More than Cognition in the Study of Conspiracy Thinking#704541
- Belief revision revised#90103
- Does the Phrase “Conspiracy Theory” Matter?#102377
Record · ID 989379
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive