Meman v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness)

canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, fct, 2026canlii96351, 2026 canlii 96351 (fc), 2026, canlii, 96351, (fc), imm-25405-26, 2026, procedure, stay of removal, interlocutory relief, rjr, macdonald inc v canada (attorney general), toth v canada (minister of employment and immigration), whether granting the requested relief is just and equitable in all of the circumstances, three, part test applied to stay of removal pending leave and judicial review, motion dismissed, procedure, serious issue, elevated standard on refusal to defer removal, wang v canada (minister of citizenship and immigration), baron v canada (minister of public safety and emergency preparedness), whether the underlying application raises a serious issue under an elevated standard, cbsa officer speculation noted but not rooted in the record, serious issue not established, motion dismissed, procedure, irreparable harm, removal from canada, whether the evidence establishes irreparable harm to the applicant or family if the stay is not granted, hardship to sister and her children without daily presence considered, possible impact on pending h&c application assessed, irreparable harm not established, motion dismissed, procedure, balance of convenience, enforcement of removal order, whether the balance of convenience favours the moving party, public legal duty to enforce removal orders as soon as possible weighed, applicant’s residence in canada and criminal harassment conviction considered, balance of convenience favours enforcement, motion dismissed