Zenodo (CERN)
open access
CC BY 4.0
The Limits of Sacred Authority: Consent, Withdrawal, and Non-Imposition in Religious Jurisdiction
Religious traditions may teach exclusive doctrines, organize rites, credential specialists, control offices and membership, refuse recognition, and end association. This paper does not decide whether the individual, lineage, community, ancestral line, or land is the primary bearer of sacred stand
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- From Pedestal to Pavement: Monumental Politics, Manufactured Salvation, the Inversion of the Social Base, the New Religious Architecture of Power, and the Structural Grammar of Authoritarian Collapse#706031
- How Rituals Shape Authority: The Mesopotamian Exorcist’s Self-Presentation in Ritual Texts and Practice#260922
- Uniting Monotheistic Religions: A Philosophical Framework for Religious Convergence#732728
- Uniting Monotheistic Religions: A Philosophical Framework for Religious Convergence#90139
- The Spirit Before Law: A Philosophical Reconstruction of Javanese Spirits as Sacral Social Control#691102
Record · ID 990557
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive