ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block Versus Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block
assess and compare the efficacy of pericapsular nerve group block wersus lumber erector spinae plane block in reducing postoperative pain within the first 24 hours after hip surgeries.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Pericapsular Nerve Group Block Versus Lumber Erector Spinae Plane Block for Pain Management After Total Hip Arthroplasty#1093953
- Is Pericapsular Nerve Group Block Better Than Interscalene Nerve Block Regarding Effect on Hand Movement in Shoulder Scope Surgeries?#993350
- Comparison of Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block and Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane(TLIP) Block for the Management of Postoperative Pain in Spinal Surgery#1111972
- Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block: Cadaveric Study#856979
- The Pericapsular Nerve Block in Total Hip Arthroplasty#916058
Record · ID 992268
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive