PhilArchive
open access
A Reflection on 'The God Feculty': John Henry Newman in Conversation with the Cognitive Science of Religion
Many Christian philosophers suppose that there exists a “god-faculty”—a cognitive disposition that naturally and rightly inclines human beings toward theistic belief without aid from any argument. In his Essay in Aid of A Grammar of Assent (1870) John Henry Newman defends an account of the nature of these dispositions, an account that has the moral conscience at its core. In the meantime, the cognitive science of religion has identified many other such dispositions besides. This chapter aims to bring Newman into conversation with current cognitive science of religion with an aim toward better understanding the role of Newman’s conscience within a wider account of the cognitive foundations of theistic belief. First, I’ll argue that while Newman (understandably) makes no attempt to draw any line of support for his view from evolutionary psychology, such support is now available in spades. Second, I’ll argue that Newman’s account of conscience deserves special emphasis in connection with what Christian philosophers call “the cognitive consequences of sin”. While it’s relatively easy to predict how moral wrongdoing would compromise the cognitive mechanisms that Newman draws our attention to, the matter is far less straightforward with reference to those mechanisms that receive the most press in the cognitive science of religion.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- An Essay in Aid of Newman's Theory of Development: A Metaphysics for 'Religious Impressions'#228728
- The Christological Root of Heresy in the Thought of JH Newman#763933
- Religious Belief is not Natural. Why cognitive science of religion does not show that religious belief is rational.#774834
- The Evidential Problem of Evil and the Aesthetics of Surprise#98011
- The Moral Credentials of Divine Authority — 42#689023
Record · ID 99273
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive