ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of Two Needle Insertion Techniques on Success Rate and Complications During Central Venous Catheterization
The purpose of this study is to compare two needle insertion techniques(Seldinger vs. modified Seldinger technique) on success rate and complications during central venous catheterization.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparison of Different Methods of Nasogastric Tube Insertion in Anesthetized and Intubated Patients#910501
- Immediate Complications According to Ultrasound-guided Central Venous Catheters Insertion Site: a Non-inferiority Randomized Clinical Trial#1093296
- Ultrasound-Guided Peripheral Venous Access Using AccuCath#844943
- Long-versus Short-Axis Ultrasound Guidance for Subclavian Vein Cannulation#1075364
- Comparison of Short-Axis and Long-Axis Internal Jugular Vein Cannulation for First-Pass Success#841391
Record · ID 993445
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive