Conceptio › Archive › PhilArchive
PhilArchive open access

Selling Ethics

Beck, Asad I. et al. · 2025
PhilArchive · Papers · 2025
Open Source ↗
philosophy
Barnes et al. (2025) emphasize the need for current biobanking consent models to more deeply engage participants who want to determine how their data are used. Despite agreeing with the authors on wanting to make biobanking data more private and secure, we identify deep moral difficulties with their article on two levels. On one level, we worry that the authors have not engaged deeply enough with many of the central challenges debated in the AI literature. And on a different level, rather than critically examining the use of novel technological methods for managing biobanking data, the article instead comes across as the authors trying to market the underlying technology under the guise of an ethics paper.
Conceptio Open Archive

Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio

Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.

This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗

Related documents

Record · ID 99391
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive