ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of Conventional and Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation in Knee Osteoarthritis
The aim of this study was to examine and compare the effects of conventional and cooled radiofrequency ablation on pain and disability levels in patients with knee pain resistant to other treatments due to knee osteoarthritis.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of chronic pain after knee arthroplasty: protocol for a randomized, double-blind study.#156948
- Pulsed Radiofrequency to Relieve Knee Pain#1096343
- Preop Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation for Total Knee Replacement#1103869
- An Open-label, 8-week Safety, Efficacy, and Assessment of Cooling Methods for Administration of CNTX-4975-05 for Knee OA#854745
- Comparison of Heated vs. Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment of the Genicular Nerves for Osteoarthritis Knee Pain#841672
Record · ID 994709
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive