ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
C-MAC D-Blade vs Macintosh for Postoperative Vocal Cord Evaluation
This study compares two different laryngoscopes-the C-MAC D-Blade videolaryngoscope and the Macintosh direct laryngoscope-for evaluating vocal cord mobility after thyroidectomy. Patients undergo standard anesthesia and intubation with one of the two devices. After surgery, vocal cord function is assessed to identify early postoperative vocal cord impairment. The study aims to determine whether videolaryngoscopy provides a more reliable and less traumatic method for postoperative vocal cord evaluation compared with the traditional Macintosh laryngoscope.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Comparison of C-MAC Videolaryngoscopy and Direct Laryngoscopy for Nasotracheal Intubation#866549
- Laryngeal Structure Segmentation in High-Speed Videoendoscopy Using Deep Learning#1062523
- Vocal cord dysfunction after pediatric cardiac surgery: A prospective implementation study#246338
- 3D Visualization of the Human Bony Labyrinth within the Temporal Bone of a Subadult#1023333
- Dexmedetomidine Versus Ketamine on Laryngeal Microsurgery#866011
Record · ID 995404
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive