arXiv (All)
open access
Which Medical Questions Deserve Rationales? Perturbation-Sensitive Selection for Robust QA
Medical question-answering datasets often contain answer labels, whereas high-quality rationales remain scarce, noisy, or costly to validate. This changes the acquisition question: rather than asking which questions should be labeled, we ask which already-labeled questions should receive rationale s
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Beyond Information Seeking: Severity-Aware Question Supervision for Proactive Medical Dialogue#973340
- Toward expert-level medical question answering with large language models#359597
- Towards Expert-Level Medical Question Answering with Large Language Models#16598
- Rewarding Reasoning, Not Answers: Fixing and Bounding Test-Time Reinforcement Learning on Medical QA#1122674
- Medical paternalism, anorexia nervosa, and the problem of pathological values#99600
Record · ID 996514
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive