arXiv (All)
open access
Decision Shifts, Lost Label Functionality, and an Inconclusive Grounding Audit in Correctness-Gated Multi-Teacher Distillation
Candidate decision correctness and rationale grounding are different objectives. We examine correctness-gated multi-teacher distillation in a fixed experiment. Eight arms share 4,330 sources, a 63.9M-parameter student, 12,990 optimization rows, 406 updates, evidence inputs, and a decoder; seven teac
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Distill What You Trust: Reliability-Aware Multi-Teacher On-Policy Distillation#1049433
- D$^3$-MOPD: Dynamic Domain ScheDuling for Efficient Multi-Teacher Distillation#1013669
- TeacherGRPO: Closing the Capacity Gap in Reasoning Distillation via Teacher Alignment#1118138
- CLOOPD: Closing the Learner Loop in On-Policy Distillation#1050326
- Optimizing Teacher-Student Partitioning for Scalable Knowledge Distillation on HPC Systems#319646
Record · ID 996530
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive