arXiv (All)
open access
When Does Defendant Statement Matter? A Study of Bias and Persuasion in LLM-Simulated Jurors
LLMs have been used to simulate human decision-making in professional settings, yet their behaviors in common-law jury trials remain unexplored. We study when and how a defendant's courtroom statement affects LLM-simulated jurors, focusing on persuasion, ideological bias, and background-based affini
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- How to improve consumers’ understanding of online legal information: insights from a behavioral experiment#285474
- Effects of attribute framing on cognitive processing and evaluation#746782
- Hallucination, Agency Illusions, and Safety Failures in Language Models A Constraint-Based Account of Stateless Reasoning#71642
- Against Stable Folk Theories of Free Will: Why Deterministic Judgments Are Hybrid#89509
- Debias It Yourself: Teaching LLMs Cognitive Bias Mitigation Interventions#1154391
Record · ID 996700
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive