arXiv (All)
open access
Can We Trust Video Hallucination Detectors? VidHalLoc for Evaluating the Evaluators
Video-language models and video agents can produce hallucinations that conflict with spatiotemporal evidence. Existing benchmarks mainly evaluate model hallucinations, and heterogeneous mechanisms make detector reliability difficult to compare. We introduce VidHalLoc, a benchmark that evaluates hall
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Beneath the Scores: Rethinking Hallucination Evaluation for Video Understanding Models#1076647
- Revealing Multi-View Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models#820396
- STRAND: Benchmarking and Improving Object-Centric Spatio-Temporal Monitoring in Video Large Language Models#1077535
- Reducing Hallucination in Vision-Language Models via Stage-wise Preference Optimization under Distribution Shift#200592
- SpanCalib-VLM: Calibrated Hallucination Span Detection in Vision-Language Models#799221
Record · ID 996708
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive