arXiv (All)
open access
Multi-Level Narrative Evaluation Outperforms Lexical Features for Mental Health
How people narrate their experiences offers a window into how the mind organizes them. Computational approaches to therapeutic writing have evolved from lexical counting to neural methods, yet remain fragmented: dictionary tools miss discourse structure, while embeddings conflate local coherence wit
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Narrative Coherence Standard and Child Patients' Capacity to Consent#748155
- A scoping review of large language models for generative tasks in mental health care#1180151
- When Diagnosis Becomes a Narrative Technology: Diagnostic Capture, Recognition, and Interpretive Authority#695859
- MindfulDiary: Harnessing Large Language Model to Support Psychiatric Patients' Journaling#384987
- A scoping review of applications of natural language processing for chronic pain research.#785439
Record · ID 996900
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive