arXiv (All)
open access
Fundamental limits to identifying node and tie memory in temporal networks: marginal artefacts and spreading dynamics
Temporal-network models attribute memory in contact data to either node self-excitation (branching ratio n_node) or tie reinforcement (kappa), carrying major consequences for epidemic spreading. We prove that when event initiators are observed, the two mechanisms are orthogonal: the Fisher informati
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Recovering Unobserved Network Links from Aggregated Relational Data: Bayesian Latent Surface Modeling and Penalized Regression#996861
- GraphWake: Group Polarization via Memory-Mediated Polarization Cascade in LLM-Agent Communities#463282
- Disentangling Repetition and Imitation Components of Preferential Attachment in Social Action Networks#209820
- Memory mechanisms for behavioural change in Bayesian individual-level spatial epidemic models#311491
- Structural Connectivity of Functionally Defined Episodic Memory Networks: A Large-Scale Connectome-Behavior Study.#265484
Record · ID 997284
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive