arXiv (All)
open access
When Passing Tests Hides Vulnerabilities: An Empirical Study of Silent Failures in Agentic Systems
LLM-based agents for automated code repair have received significant attention in recent years from both research and software engineering practice perspectives. However, limited attention has been paid to patches that pass syntactic and functional verification but still retain or introduce security
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Evaluating Agentic Code Repair Capabilities in Distributed Systems#609283
- Evaluating Agentic Code Repair Capabilities in Distributed Systems#459635
- Does Fixing Break Security? An Empirical Study of Security Degradation in Iterative LLM-Driven Infrastructure-as-Code Repair#451219
- Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Dynamics of Agentic Multi-Hunk Repair#1130164
- RepoAtlas: Guiding Coding Agents via Evolving Multimodal Repository Views#1123347
Record · ID 997554
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive