arXiv (All)
open access
Well-Defined but Not Predetermined Persistent Mathematical Objects, Embedded Observers, and the Provability of P = N P
We develop a foundational distinction between \emph{well-definedness} and \emph{predetermination}. A persistent mathematical or computational object may return a unique answer whenever a query is made and preserve every previously returned answer, while its answers to as-yet unqueried inputs are not
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Knowing What to Keep: Faithful Compression as a Principle for Understanding Reality, Intelligence, and Quantum Systems#76425
- Unified quantification of entanglement and magic in information scrambling and their trade-off relation#629810
- Unified quantification of entanglement and magic in information scrambling and their trade-off relation#627948
- Arithmetic logical Irreversibility and the Halting Problem (Revised and Fixed version)#724996
- Who and What: A Rosetta Stone of Continuance#88528
Record · ID 997839
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive