arXiv (All)
open access
Prompt-Induced Waste in Coding Agents: Reasoning, Effort, Harness Design, and End-to-End Cost
Coding-agent efficiency cannot be characterized by token count or model price alone. End-to-end cost and task success depend jointly on prompt semantics, inference effort, harness policy, model, task difficulty, tool use, context management, and provider accounting. Controlled experiments show that
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- How Do AI Agents Spend Your Money? Analyzing and Predicting Token Consumption in Agentic Coding Tasks#134612
- Analyzing and Mitigating Cost-Inefficient Behaviors in Coding Agents#1105284
- Introducing HALC: A general pipeline for the systematic and reliable construction of prompts for automated coding with LLMs in the computational social sciences#984878
- COUNTERMEM: World-Model Verified Counter-Factual Memory for Language Agents#1115830
- MA-SAPO: Multi-Agent Reasoning for Score-Aware Prompt Optimization#1118430
Record · ID 998317
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive