arXiv (All)
open access
Toward Collective-Centric Evaluation of Preference Inference for Participatory Democracy
To scale up collective decision-making, participatory democracy platforms such as Polis and Remesh enable online deliberation among thousands of participants. However, at this scale, participants cannot review every opinion submitted by others, producing highly sparse voting data that misrepresent p
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- How Convincing Is a Crowd? Quantifying the Persuasiveness of a Consensus for Different Individuals and Types of Claims.#425087
- DIAL: Position-Debiased LLM Judges with Adaptive Human Preference Calibration#1105773
- Understanding Human Perception of Representation in Citizens' Assemblies: An Empirical Study#1063579
- Democratic ICAI: Debating Our Way to Steering Principles from Preferences#319656
- Promoting civic and voter education through the use of technological systems during the COVID-19 pandemic in Africa#107937
Record · ID 998380
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive