arXiv (All)
open access
Measuring the Value of World-Model Updates: A Counterfactual Utility Protocol for Continual Adaptation
Continual world models must decide whether new data justify changing the model. Fixed replay schedules and prediction-error triggers specify when to update, but neither reveals the value of an individual update: one deployment run cannot show how the same model would have performed at that moment ha
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Exact Feedback Is Not Control: Evaluating Text-based Closed-Loop Revision in LLMs#1064694
- Conservation Buys Stability and Factoring Buys Counterfactuals in Physical World Models#1014262
- Stable and Counterfactually Robust Physical World Models from Imposed Structure and Learned Physics#1154903
- World Models Under Asynchronous Sensor Observations#975349
- Anticipating the risks and benefits of counterfactual world simulation models#617142
Record · ID 998527
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive