arXiv (All)
open access
A distribution-free certification framework for trustworthy crash-severity prediction
Crash-severity models inform screening, dispatch and site prioritization, yet are deployed without a finite-sample statement of what one prediction means. Off-the-shelf guarantees fail here, because the features that make crash severity distinctive defeat them: the KABCO outcome is ordinal, the reco
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Not All Synthetic Data Are Equal: Expert-Committee Audit Screening for Imbalanced Crash-Injury-Severity Prediction in Automated Driving Systems#1077614
- Counterfactual Fragility Certificates: Exposing High-Confidence Brittleness under Structured Evidence Failure#819818
- Counterfactual Fragility Certificates: Exposing High-Confidence Brittleness under Structured Evidence Failure#809822
- Annual road fatalities, injured, injury crashes#139991
- Development and external validation of a novel prediction model for the TraumaTriage App.#30512
Record · ID 999110
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive