arXiv (All)
open access
Generative AI Assisted Workflows in Architectural Conceptual Design: Performance, Creative Self-Efficacy, and Cognitive Load
Generative AI (GenAI) is increasingly adopted in design education, yet evaluating its educational value through final outcomes provides an incomplete picture. This study compares two ecologically plausible workflows in an architectural conceptual design task: GenAI-assisted image generation and Arch
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Embedding Circularity in Conceptual Building Design: A Functional Framework for Data-Driven Decisions during the Earliest Architectural Design Stages#1135829
- Dynamic Pedagogical Deliberation for Adaptive Multimodal Tutoring in Architectural Software Education: Design and Preliminary Evaluation"#1001848
- Understanding Children’s “Tinkering” in Innovative Problem-Solving: The Roles of Knowledge Integration, Relational Reasoning, and Design Stance#453239
- Property-Guided LLM Program Synthesis for Planning#192392
- When Does an Interpretation Count as Established? The Formation, Evaluation, and Responsibility of Interpretation in Generative AI#971435
Record · ID 999713
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive