arXiv (All)
open access
WorkflowPerturb: Calibrated Stress Tests for Evaluating Multi-Agent Workflow Metrics
Multi-agent LLM systems that generate structured workflows from natural-language requests are now deployed in production across cloud automation, DevOps, and enterprise orchestration. Operating them exposes a recurring change-management problem. Routine updates, such as re-running an input, swapping
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- APIFlow-Bench: Measuring Whether Agents Survive Long, Dependent API Workflows#793951
- APIFlow-Bench: Measuring Whether Agents Survive Long, Dependent API Workflows#789932
- APIFlow-Bench: Measuring Whether Agents Survive Long, Dependent API Workflows#622623
- LLM-based Hardware Development with Hierarchical IRs and End-to-End Multi-Agent Workflow#818715
- LLM-based Hardware Development with Hierarchical IRs and End-to-End Multi-Agent Workflow#808723
Record · ID 999739
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive