arXiv (All)
open access
Capable but Careless: Do Computer-Use Agents Follow Contextual Integrity?
Computer-use agents (CUAs) now act on a user's behalf across personal applications such as email, calendars, and to-do lists. This cross-application access is useful, but it also creates a privacy risk that has been largely overlooked: when an agent works in one context, it can pull in information f
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- ADeptS-Bench: Measuring the Trustworthiness of Computer Use Agents Across Devices#1110323
- OSWorld-Pro: Process-based Evaluation for Computer Use Agents#1051287
- OSWorld-Pro: Process-based Evaluation for Computer Use Agents#1028686
- Generation of Web Apps with Agentic IDEs: An Empirical Assessment#662095
- Generation of Web Apps with Agentic IDEs: An Empirical Assessment#661045
Record · ID 999817
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive