Othermetadata only
cincinnati_law
cincinnati_law · Other · License: Unknown
400Documents
0Full text
2026-08-25Last indexed
Recent documents from this source
- RETHINKING TAX PRIORITIES: MARRIAGE NEUTRALITY, CHILDREN, AND CONTEMPORARY FAMILIES#494768
- FORECLOSURE, SUBPRIME MORTGAGE LENDING, AND THE MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEM#494767
- THE NEED FOR A REVITALIZED REGULATORY SCHEME TO ADDRESS WORKPLACE BULLYING IN THE UNITED STATES: HARNESSING THE FEDERAL OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT#494766
- GROPING ALONG BETWEEN THINGS REAL AND THINGS PERSONAL: DEFINING FIXTURES IN LAW AND POLICY IN THE UCC#494765
- PRESERVING THE CORPORATE ATTORNEY–CLIENT PRIVILEGE#494764
- A FEW GOOD LAWS: WHY FEDERAL CRIMINAL LAW NEEDS A GENERAL ATTEMPT PROVISION AND HOW MILITARY LAW CAN PROVIDE ONE#494763
- IN LOCO PARENTIS IN THE PUBLIC SCHOOLS: ABUSED, CONFUSED, AND IN NEED OF CHANGE#494762
- THE COMPLEXITY OF COMPLEXITY: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF JUROR COMPETENCE IN CIVIL CASES#494761
- “IT’S NOT EASY BEING GREEN”: LOCAL INITIATIVES, PREEMPTION PROBLEMS, AND THE MARKET PARTICIPANT EXCEPTION#494760
- JUDICIAL PREEMPTION OF PUNITIVE DAMAGES#494759
- SHAREHOLDERS IN THE JURY BOX: A POPULIST CHECK AGAINST CORPORATE MISMANAGEMENT#494758
- STATE SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY AND THE LAW OF NATIONS: INCORPORATING A COMMERCIAL ACT EXCEPTION INTO ELEVENTH AMENDMENT SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY#494757
- TAINTED LOANS: THE VALUE OF A MASS TORTS APPROACH IN SUBPRIME MORTGAGE LITIGATION#494756
- UNSTACKING THE DECK? CONTRACT MANIPULATION AND CREDIT CARD ACCOUNTABILITY#494755
- A REVALUATION OF CY PRES REDUX#494754
- REVITALIZING THE ADVERSARY SYSTEM IN FAMILY LAW#494753
- THE IMPROPER APPLICATION OF THE CLEAR AND CONVINCING STANDARD OF PROOF: ARE BANKRUPTCY COURTS DISTORTING ACCEPTED RISK ALLOCATION SCHEMES?#494752
- JUDGE SHOPPING: TESTING WHETHER JUDGES’ POLITICAL ORIENTATIONS AFFECT CASE FILINGS#494751
- SMO’ MONEY, MO’ PROBLEMS: SHOULD APPELLATE COURTS HAVE NONPARTY JURISDICTION OVER LAWYERS’ APPEALS FROM NONMONETARY SANCTIONS?#494750
- TO TWEET OR NOT TO TWEET: TWITTER, “BROADCASTING,” AND FEDERAL RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 53#494749
Source record · cincinnati_law · Other · License: Unknown
Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive — counts are materialised per sync from the index (real full-text coverage, never license entitlement).