private-law

Documents about private-law

• Etika Profesi Pegawai Swasta di Bidang Marketing : Analisis Yuridis dan Implementasi dalam Praktik Bisnis Moderngawai Swasta Di Bidang Marketing: Analisis Yuridis Dan Implementasi Dalam Praktik Bisnis Modern#1006250Terang : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum
• 2 U.S.C. § 1952 — Payments from Fund for families of Detective Gibson and Private First Class Chestnut and certain other United States Capitol Police employees#557940US Code (LII)
• 42 U.S.C. § 9810 — Financial assistance to low-income families, local cooperative associations, and local public or private nonprofit organizations or entities; amount, purposes, etc.#590456US Code (LII)
• FS Credit Opportunities Corp. v. Saba Capital Master Fund, Ltd.#621351Supreme Court of the United States
• PRESERVING RIGHTS OR PERPETUATING CHAOS: AN ANALYSIS OF OHIO’S PRIVATE CHALLENGERS OF VOTERS ACT AND THE SIXTH CIRCUIT’S DECISION IN SUMMIT COUNTY DEMOCRATIC CENTRAL AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE V. BLACKWELL#494706UC College of Law
• 7 U.S.C. § 5942 — Wheat and feed grains research; regional and national research programs; utilization of services of Federal, State and private agencies; authorization of appropriations#560439US Code (LII)
• 16 U.S.C. § 565a-1 — Cooperative agreements between Secretary of Agriculture and public or private agencies, organizations, institutions, and persons covering Forest Service programs; authority; funding#570266US Code (LII)
• 43 U.S.C. § 423c — Exchange of unpatented entries; entries, farms or private lands, eliminated from project; rights not assignable; rights of lienholders; preference to ex-service men#596589US Code (LII)
• Paradis Honey Ltd. v. Canada (Agriculture and Agri-Food)#681740CanLII
• 16 U.S.C. § 410ff-7 — Expenditure of Federal funds for research, resources management, and visitor protection and use on private property; transfer of funds; authorization of appropriations#572109US Code (LII)
• 18 U.S.C. § 227 — Wrongfully influencing a private entity’s employment decisions by a Member of Congress or an officer or employee of the legislative or executive branch#574459US Code (LII)
• 44 U.S.C. § 701 — “Usual number” of documents and reports; distribution of House and Senate documents and reports; binding; reports on private bills; number of copies printed; distribution#597320US Code (LII)
• NIEKOĽKO POZNÁMOK K SÚČASNEJ A NAVRHOVANEJ PRÁVNEJ ÚPRAVE OBCHODNÉHO TAJOMSTVA NA SLOVENSKU (POROVNANIE)#181274Zenodo (CERN)
• Reproductive Innovation and Reproductive Exceptionalism: How Private Health Insurance Coverage of Fertility Treatment Complements Hostile Governmental Action and Expands Access to Assisted Reproduction in the United States#453784William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository
• Open Source Law, Policy and Practice#486898Directory of Open Access Books
• Landor v. Louisiana Dept of Corrections and Public Safety#621343Supreme Court of the United States
• 15 U.S.C. § 713a-13 — Policies and procedures for minimum acquisition of stocks by Commodity Credit Corporation, encouragement of marketing through private trade channels and procurement of maximum returns in marketplace for producers and C#567275US Code (LII)
• 재산권 보장 조항(헌법 제23조 제1항)과 민법#450639S-Space: Seoul National University
• 16 U.S.C. § 251g — Land acquisition; study and investigation of use of private lands; transmittal to President and Congress; transfer of lands to Secretary of Agriculture; excluded property within Indian reservation; continuation of concess#572483US Code (LII)
• El TJUE y el nombre de las personas físicas: principio de reconocimiento mutuo, derecho a la identidad y libre circulación de personas en la Unión Europea#676639Gestión del Repositorio Documental de la Universidad de Salamanca
• 8 CFR Part 324 — Special Classes of Persons Who May Be Naturalized: Women Who Have Lost United States Citizenship by Marriage and Former Citizens Whose Naturalization Is Authorized by Private Law#504803Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)
• Fernbrook Homes (Bass Lake) Limited v. Cameron Stephens Mortgage Capital Ltd.#638384CanLII
• Fineday v Public Complaints Commission#638464CanLII
• 16 U.S.C. § 1309 — Consultation with Secretary of the Interior; conformity of program with wetlands programs administered by Secretary of the Interior; consultation with and utilization of technical services of appropriate local, State, Fed#569177US Code (LII)
• Of the dominion, or, ownership of the sea two books. In the first is shew'd, that the sea, by the lavv of nature, or nations, is not common to all men, but capable of private dominion or proprietie, as well as the land. In the second is proved, that the dominion of the British sea, or that which incompasseth the isle of Great Britain, is, and ever hath been, a part or appendant of the empire of that island. Written at first in Latin, and entituled, Mare clausum seu, De dominio maris, by John Selden ... Translated into English; and set forth with som additional evidences and discourses#334178Internet Archive
• Plourde v Manitoba (Prosecution Service)#638474CanLII
• Yee v. Yukon Energy Corporation#638548CanLII
• To foster national innovation, Brazil enacted the Innovation Law (Law No. 10,973/2004), which established Technological Innovation Centers within Scientific, Technological, and Innovation Institutions. Initially tasked with managing institutional innovation policies, these centers gained expanded responsibilities under Law No. 13,243/2016, strengthening their role in strategic innovation management. Despite these advances, implementation still faces institutional challenges, including limited recognition of innovation’s importance, bureaucratic barriers, and insufficient human resources. This study evaluates the performance of the Innovation Center at the Federal University of Paraíba (INOVA/UFPB) in the national context following the 2016 Legal Framework for Science, Technology, and Innovation. A literature review on obstacles and benefits associated with the legislation was conducted, alongside a case study based on institutional document analysis. Findings indicate that INOVA/UFPB possesses structural conditions supporting autonomy and exhibits strong performance in invention patents, ranking first nationally for two consecutive years. Nonetheless, challenges remain, including limited program visibility and difficulties in providing training and mentoring. A SWOT analysis guided the center’s evaluation, leading to proposed improvement actions, such as establishing innovation residency programs and strengthening partnerships with the private sector. In conclusion, while INOVA/UFPB shows significant potential for knowledge generation and technology transfer, its further development depends on addressing institutional obstacles, expanding partnerships, and enhancing market engagement.#265724Repositório Institucional da UFPB
• A.P. v H.O.#638524CanLII
• Marlowe v Barlas#638562CanLII