sentencing

Documents about sentencing

• Determining ‘Reasonableness’ Without a Reason? Federal Appellate Review Post-Rita v. United States#683916eScholarship
• 2023 Sentencing Review#636968Open Research
• Sentencing of child offenders who turn eighteen at the time of or prior to sentencing in Kenya#956035SU+ Digital Repository
• Penile Polygraphy: The Admissibility of Penile-Plethysmograph Results at Sentencing in Tennessee#1019603Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law
• The Difference a Day Makes: How Courts Circumvent Federal Immigration Law at Sentencing#648418Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons
• Algorithmic Sentencing and Human Dignity#690117PhilArchive
• Judging by the Cover: On the Relationship Between Media Coverage on Crime and Harshness in Sentencing#352180OSF
• Heinous, Atrocious, and Cruel: Apprendi, Indeterminate Sentencing, and the Meaning of Punishment#648149Santa Clara Law Digital Commons
• Habeas Corpus and State Sentencing Reform: A Story of Unintended Consequences#1019515Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law
• The Effects of Trial Judge Gender and Public Opinion on Criminal Sentencing Decisions#1019674Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law
• LEGAL FOUNDATIONS FOR ENSURING THE PRINCIPLES OF JUSTICE AND HUMANITY IN CRIMINAL SENTENCING#356102Zenodo (CERN)
• R v Ikkidluak#638585CanLII
• Does Predictive Sentencing Make Sense?#717805PhilArchive
• Stepping Forward Toward Uniform Sentencing Guidelines for Corporate Criminal Liability: A Theoretical and Practical Legal Review#243356Yuridika
• Sentencing Act 2026 (2026)#14120UK Legislation
• A Call for Judicial Scrutiny: How Increased Judicial Discretion Has Led To Disparity and Unpredictability in Federal Sentencings for Child Pornography#648391Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons
• Trafficked in Texas: Combatting the Sex-Trafficking Epidemic Through Prostitution Law and Sentencing Reform in the Lone Star State#1019633Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law
• AI in criminal sentencing: mapping the ethical terrain#693499PhilArchive
• Artificial Intelligence to Assist Unrepresented Defendants in Sentencing Hearings#229649Figshare
• Sexual Violence, Sanity, and Safety: Constitutional Parameters for Involuntary Civil Commitment of Sex Offenders#1020064Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons
• Do the United States Sentencing Guidelines Deprive Defendants of Due Process?#494674UC College of Law
• Finding "Tapia Error": How Circuit Courts Have Misread 'Tapia v. United States' and Shortchanged the Penological Goals of the Sentencing Reform Act#1019698Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law
• The Need for a Sentencing “Second Look” Statute in Tennessee#173675Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law
• JUSTICE IN SENTENCING: LEGAL CRITERIA FOR PROPORTIONALITY AND INDIVIDUALIZATION#181225Zenodo (CERN)
• SHOT CALLER: THE WEIGHT OF THE UNITED STATES SENTENCING GUIDELINES#454259Digital Commons @ Western New England University
• A New Era of Federal Sentencing: The Guidelines Provide District Court Judges a Cloak, but Is Gall Their Dagger?#183594Digital Commons @ University of Georgia School of Law
• 21 U.S.C. § 850 — Information for sentencing#577060US Code (LII)
• The effect of real-name reporting of specified juveniles on sentencing#69070J-STAGE (Japan)
• Multi-Source Retrieval and Reasoning for Legal Sentencing Prediction#799952arXiv (All)
• State Criminal Appeals Revealed#1019680Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law
• 18 U.S.C. § 3559 — Sentencing classification of offenses#573321US Code (LII)
• 18 U.S.C. § 3673 — Definitions for sentencing provisions#573372US Code (LII)
• “We Can’t Just Throw Our Children Away”: A Discussion of the Term-of-Years Sentencing of Juveniles and What Can Be Done in Texas#1021923Texas A&M Law Scholarship
• R v Tuluqtuq#638584CanLII
• Reconciling the opposing effects of neurobiological evidence on criminal sentencing judgments#116179PhilArchive
• Defunding State Prisons#465828Santa Clara Law Digital Commons
• Reconciliation as the Aim of a Criminal Trial: Ubuntu’s Implications for Sentencing#753318PhilArchive
• Iudicium ex Machinae – The Ethical Challenges of Automated Decision-Making in Criminal Sentencing#772835PhilArchive
• Beyond Good and Bad Controls: Endogenous Legal Factors in Sentencing Research#990462Zenodo (CERN)
• Beyond Blakely#1019511Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law
• 18 U.S.C. § 3661 — Use of information for sentencing#573359US Code (LII)
• The Sentencing Act 2026 (Commencement No. 3) Regulations 2026 (2026)#14134UK Legislation
• Criminal Sentencing in Nineteenth Century Pennsylvania#21559NBER
• Must Jurors Know the Stakes of Conviction? Sentencing, Encroachment, and Legal Proof#80876PhilArchive
• The Sentencing Act 2026 (Commencement No. 4) Regulations 2026 (2026)#278244UK Legislation
• The Criminal Justice (Sentencing) (Licence Conditions) (Amendment) Order 2026 (2026)#349048UK Legislation
• The Sentencing Act 2026 (Commencement No. 5) Regulations 2026 (2026)#355747UK Legislation
• The Next Era of Sentencing Reform#649837Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository
• Learning to Discriminate: The Perfect Proxy Problem in Artificially Intelligent Criminal Sentencing#717430PhilArchive
• 28 U.S.C. § 334 — Institutes and joint councils on sentencing#557311US Code (LII)