ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Remimazolam Versus Midaszolam for Sedation in Diagnostic Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the efficacy of remimazolam with midazolam in patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Superiority of total procedure time in remimazolam compared to midazolam * The success of sedation time This is the single blind study.; Patients will not know what they are given as the sedation drug If there is a comparison group: Researchers will compare patients with midazolam group to see if remimazolam group is superior to midazolam group
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Analgesia During Pediatric Digestive Endoscopy: a Comparison of Two Protocols for Procedural Sedation#833014
- Nebulized vs. Oral Midazolam Sedation in Pediatric Anesthesia: A Randomized Comparative Study#863861
- Bispectral Index-guided Sedation for Flexible Bronchoscopy#1073627
- Sedation Using Intranasal Dexmedetomidine in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy#908255
- Multiple Dose Safety and Efficacy Study Evaluating CNS 7056 Versus Midazolam in Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy#836900
Record · ID 1007147
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive