ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Bacterial Reduction of Rotary Versus Manual Filing System Using Different Irrigants in Primary Molars
This study will evaluate and compare the microbial efficacy of rotary and manual filing system using Neem extract, NaOCL and saline . with hypotheses that neem can used alternative to sodium hypochlorite and there is no difference between rotary and manual filling in bacterial reduction.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Antimicrobial Efficacy of Four Different Irrigation Protocols#885165
- Protocols to evaluate the antibacterial and irrigation efficacy of new root canal irrigants: A systematic review of ex vivo studies#253509
- Antibacterial Effect and Postoperative Pain After Triton Irrigation Protocol in Necrotic Mandibular Molar#863829
- Influence of Irrigant Delivery Systems on the Incidence of Postoperative Discomfort in Oval Canals#1103269
- Radicular Dentin Remaining, Risk of Perforation and Canal Transportation in Manual Versus Rotary Instrumentation in Primary Molars#1031584
Record · ID 1008633
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive